Worse Than Poop!

Why is carbon dioxide worse than poop? Find out with the help of an 8-year-old science expert, the Green Ninja, and a fleet of pooping cars!
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Why Poop?
  • The Team
  • Contact
  • Poopie Pledge
  • Español
  • Videos
  • Home
  • About
  • Blog
  • Why Poop?
  • The Team
  • Contact
  • Poopie Pledge
  • Español
  • Videos
IMG_6845.JPG

Blog

Behind the scenes of the Pooping Cars movie

  • All
  • airplane pollution
  • alternative transportatio
  • carbon dioxide
  • carbon footprint
  • carbon offset
  • carbon pollution
  • civic engagement
  • clean technology
  • climate activism
  • crowdfunding
  • electric vehicles
  • events
  • Film Festivals
  • flying
  • Policy
  • pooping airplane
  • public transit
  • Safe Routes to Schools
  • satire
  • STEM education
  • streets
  • worse than poop

The EPA: It Isn't Just for Clean Air Anymore

Vanessa Warheit May 2, 2017

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is currently taking comments on its proposal to repeal, replace, or modify environmental protections “to alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens.” The proposal is almost nonsensical in its vagueness, and could apply to any EPA regulations.

The EPA is a public health agency, created by a Republican president to ensure the health and safety of our nation. I urge everyone who breathes air, drinks water, or relies on a stable climate to submit a comment - because your future is at stake. You can find information about how to make a comment, with a link to the comments input page, here: www.indivisibleberkeley.org/epa

This is what I submitted:

I oppose any arbitrary efforts to remove common-sense environmental protections. I support the protection, which the EPA provides in the form of regulations, of human health and the environment that sustains all of us.

EPA regulations are based on sound, peer-reviewed science. They were crafted specifically to protect human beings and the environment we rely on. Any future changes to EPA regulations must therefore address the degree to which regulatory changes would increase adverse outcomes for humans and the environment (e.g., increased 'spare the air' days, increased numbers of cancers and other illnesses, adverse effects on endangered species, etc.). 

I have witnessed, here in my home state of California, the positive changes in air quality that are a direct result of environmental regulation. When I was a kid, there were often days when the air was a filthy brown color. Today, even though my state has doubled in population, the skies are much cleaner. Yet we still have high asthma rates. If anything, we need *more* protections for our air and water! 

Improvements in air and water quality improve not only our health and well-being but also our economy. From 1990 - 2012, pollution in the US decreased dramatically, while our GDP doubled. The EPA conservatively estimates that the regulatory benefits of the Clean Air Act exceed its costs by a ratio of 25 to 1. Where else can you get that kind of return? Any proposed elimination of regulations that protect our air and water must therefore also address the costs of the associated health impacts on workers - and their families - such as increased healthcare costs, days missed from work, and lives lost.

Furthermore, the EPA's Clean Power Plan is the single biggest policy lever currently in place to limit our nation's greenhouse gas emissions. We need stringent regulations on carbon pollution to keep our pledge to the other nations of the world - and to our children - that we are doing everything we can to ensure a livable planet for their future. Right now it is a scientific fact that we are on a collision course with a destabilized climate - something the Department of Defense calls a 'threat multiplier'. We are already feeling the effects of climate change, stronger and faster than scientists originally predicted: the ice caps are melting, the seas are rising, the storms are getting stronger, more wildfires are burning, and the droughts and floods are happening with increasing and depressing regularity. We simply don't have time to yank away regulations, willy-nilly, just so a few companies can make some more money by polluting for free. If we value our children's future, we need to be building a clean energy economy, and we need to be doing it at breakneck speed. In order to do that, we must have a strong EPA that protects our air from carbon pollution and holds polluters accountable.

Lastly, the request for comments does not list or provide reference information to the specific regulations that might be covered by the request. The request should therefore be re-issued with a list of potentially affected regulations, and an extended deadline so that the public can provide properly informed comments.

On a personal note, I am worried about the repeal, replacement, or modification of environmental protections because I am terrified about what kind of world I am leaving to my son. As someone born in the late 60s, I grew up witnessing a country that felt like it was getting better - with the skies getting cleaner, and the future getting brighter. If you want to make America great again, the last thing you should be doing is tearing away at the EPA's protections of our air, our water, and our climate. The EPA is, quite frankly, one of the best things about the USA.

I drink water every day, as does everyone in my family. Every time I turn on my tap, I'm grateful that I live in a country that protects my right to clean, potable water. My family also breathes air, and I am grateful that the government makes sure it's clean and safe. We live in a city near the ocean, whose many services all depend on a stable climate and a stable coastline. If you start ripping out the protections provided by the EPA, all of that is at risk - and as a mother I cannot sit by and watch that happen.

So I am begging you: DON'T REPEAL OR REPLACE ANY EPA REGULATIONS. There are a thousand other better things you can do with your time.

Thank you.

Vanessa Warheit

In civic engagement Tags EPA, environment, climate change, climate action, air pollution, water pollution, air quality, Clean Power Plan
Comment

'Til the Wellheads Run Dry

Vanessa Warheit February 21, 2016

I've been down with the flu this week - and one day I woke from a nap with the lyrics for a new parody of Don McLean's American Pie running through my head. Elliot and I had recently been watching Weird Al's excellent parody, "The Saga Begins" - but my parody lyrics were directly connected to climate change. And politics.

After a day of writing, and another day or two of tweaking (plus some input from Elliot and a few friends), I debuted the song last night at a friend's karaoke party. It was a big hit, and by the end everyone was singing along with the chorus. So here it is - try it out and see what you think! 

I'm working on making a good recording of it - but in the meantime you can listen to a poorly-recorded version (with cheesy karaoke backup) here.

You can download the lyrics with guitar chords here, and the piano music is available here and here. 

'Til the Wellheads Run Dry
Music by Don McLean, Words by Vanessa Warheit

A long, long time ago, 
something magic happened, 
when James Watt built a steam machine

And with it brought us fossil fuels
to rev up all our power tools
and build a brand new world - it was a dream

But like all dreams, it couldn’t last
The air pollution grew too fast
And now the climate’s changing
It’s time for rearranging

Cause physics doesn’t care at all
The ice keeps melting, while we stall
7 billion on one blue ball
We all will need to try

So bye-bye to the ridiculous lie
That we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

Well the good news is, we’ve got all we need
The power’s there - but, so’s the greed
We need a revolution soon
Cause the money’s gone to a chosen few
And they don’t think like me & you
‘bout the future, no, that’s not the way of wall street…

But we’ve got a big election soon
Will it save us all, or spell our doom
The choice seems pretty clear…
Feel the Bern, or feed the fear… ooh!

We need a new supreme court justice too
The last one’s gone, it’s really true,
Let’s send up a prayer or two
I think, it’s worth a try. Cause I’m still singing.. 

Bye-bye to the ridiculous lie
That we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

Now the reasons, well I must have missed ‘em,
For rippin out our life-support systems
‘Cause, that’s not how it needs to be…

We’ve got geothermal and lots of solar
To keep us cosy in the next big polar
vortex - brr - and don’t forget the wind… 

‘Cause we’ve seen how strong that wind can blow,
And storage - yeah, there’s still a ways to go - 
But financing is the key-
Can we end the oil subsidy? ooh -

‘Cause with a methane plume over LA
A melting Arctic and a rising bay
I’m worried my kid might not be OK
Unless, we start to try….
So let’s start singing

Bye-bye to the ridiculous lie
That we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

From Rio to Paris, they still keep meeting
To discuss the Mauna Loa readings,
400 parts & rising fast….

Fossil fuels have been a blast
But pretty soon, the die will be cast
I’m afraid our... generation... is the last

To take a stand and make things right
To ensure our future’s bright
We know what we need to do
Oh, and I think that you do too

We need more public transit, and high-speed trains,
Electric cars, and safe bike lanes
We could even fly in solar airplanes
But only if we try…
That’s why I’m singing

Bye bye to that ridiculous lie
That says we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

Oh we are one human race,
On one little planet, alone in space
You’d think that we could find a way…

So bring on tiny houses, and safer streets
Healthy forests, and pastured meats,
And veggie meals, each & every day…

And if you’re waiting for the billionaires
Remember you are the one who cares
And nobody else but you
Can do that thing you do

So bring on your passion, Bring on your dreams
Together, we can do anything
The time is now, the train is leaving
C’mon, we’ve got to try.
And we’re all singing

Bye-by to that ridiculous lie
That says we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
'Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

I met a girl who had a dream
She saw a future, safe and clean
So I asked her, can you see the way?

Take a look around, she said
All those plans inside your head
Make them real, make them see the light of day.

Go out there and tell your friends
It’s not too late to change the end
You could all stand up now or
never know your power

So folks I hope you’ll follow me
And be the change you want to see
We haven’t got a Planet B
We’ve got to stand and fight.

So bye-by to that ridiculous lie
That says we’ve gotta keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
'Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die
Yes that would be a dumb way to die

Bye-by to that ridiculous lie
That says we have to keep on drilling til the wellheads run dry
Cause if we do, we know the planet will fry
And that would be a dumb way to die.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In electric vehicles, flying, civic engagement, carbon pollution, public transit, climate activism, satire, clean technology Tags climate action, music, satire, protest songs
1 Comment

An Open Letter to the Silicon Valley Business Times

Vanessa Warheit February 15, 2016

The past week has held some serious surprises - among them the US Supreme Court's decision to stay enforcement of the Clean Power Plan, and the subsequent death of Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. But a smaller surprise - at least to me - was an article in the Silicon Valley Business Journal, about how businesses were thrilled about the SCOTUS decision.

Now, maybe I'm just naive - but I find it odd that the main business newspaper of Silicon Valley would be saying stuff like this:

“The National Federation of Independent Business said the rule would result in “substantially higher energy costs” for small businesses as well. The court’s stay “gave small businesses and the states some breathing room until it can decide the matter.”

Funny - I thought businesses were actually pretty pleased with the Clean Power Plan, as it finally gave them some certainty about how the government was going to start dealing our massive and mounting carbon problem. Staying its enforcement just throws the American business environment back into murky waters. Who was this National Federation of Independent Business, anyway?

Turns out - and I know, I shouldn't be surprised, but I am - they're a shill for Koch Industries and their cronies, as were most of the others interviewed for the article. 

AN OPEN LETTER TO THE SILICON VALLEY BUSINESS JOURNAL

I was surprised to read your Feb. 10, 2016 article on the recent Supreme Court stay against enforcing the EPA’s Clean Power Plan (“Business groups pleased Supreme Court put EPA's power plant rule on hold”). To read the article, it would seem the entire business community is lined up in opposition to the Clean Power Plan. Nothing, however, could be farther from the truth. 

Last July, no less than 365 leading companies and investors sent a public letter of support for the Clean Power Plan - including industry giants such as General Mills, Mars Inc., Nestle, Staples, Unilever and VF Corporation. “Our support is firmly grounded in economic reality,” they wrote - a reality that includes some statistics conspicuously missing from your February article, such as:

  • The average price of a commercial PV system dropped nearly 30% from 2012-2015, and continues to fall precipitously
  • Electricity generated by large wind farms is now cost-competitive in many places with coal and natural gas
  • 60% of Americans support the Clean Power Plan

The article is not only inaccurate, it underestimates (if not outright insults) the American business community. Are we really so short-sighted as to ignore the fact that power plants account for nearly 40 percent of US carbon pollution? Are we really so immoral as to ignore the fact that this pollution contributes to life-threatening illnesses, like childhood asthma, that cost us billions of dollars in healthcare costs and thousands of lives each year?

Experts say the Clean Power Plan is the single biggest step the US has ever taken to reduce carbon emissions and address climate change (and all the problems that come with it). As a small business owner, a mother, and a concerned citizen of Silicon Valley, I am pleased to know that the business community does in fact care about the world we live in, and sees the financial benefits of moving away from the dirty, destructive fuels we no longer need for economic growth. Despite the recent misguided decision by the Supreme Court, I hope you will share with your readers that there are, in fact, many in the business community working hard to ensure a safe and secure future for our children.

In civic engagement, climate activism Tags SCOTUS, Clean Power Plan, climate action
Comment
Vanessa and Elliot at the Environmental Youth Forum in San Rafael

Vanessa and Elliot at the Environmental Youth Forum in San Rafael

Youth Screenings, M-F

Vanessa Warheit February 15, 2016

We started and ended last week with youth screenings. On Monday, we drove to San Rafael, where the Mill Valley Film Festival's Environmental Youth Forum was screening Worse Than Poop! 

Vanessa and Elliot onstage with "Racing with Copepods" Producer Barbara McVeigh

Vanessa and Elliot onstage with "Racing with Copepods" Producer Barbara McVeigh

On Friday, we attended a screening as part of Los Altos High School's annual "History Week" - which had an environmental theme this year.

Vanessa and Elliot answer questions at a Los Altos High School screening of Worse Than Poop!

Vanessa and Elliot answer questions at a Los Altos High School screening of Worse Than Poop!

As you might imagine, the elementary and middle school audience on Monday was a bit more engaged than the high school students - most of whom agreed that the film was most appropriate for a k-8 audience. Still, when I asked the high school students if they thought it might be appropriate for 9th and 10th graders, a few shyly raised their hands. And the parent volunteer who introduced us (a middle-aged surgeon) spared no effort in finding scatological references for his introduction ("I think you'll find it's a moving experience", etc.).... Proof, yet again, that you're never too old for poop jokes.

In civic engagement, climate activism, Film Festivals, Safe Routes to Schools, STEM education, worse than poop Tags Los Altos, EYF, MVFF, San Rafael, Environmental Education
1 Comment

A Modest Proposal

Vanessa Warheit December 14, 2015

A friend called me this afternoon, to ask if I'd come down to City Hall to talk about parking. Evidently, our City Council is considering - seriously considering - spending $13m to build a new parking garage in our already car-choked downtown. When I told Elliot's dad about why I'd be at City Hall this evening, he gave me a great idea. "Why don't you tell them you actually want them to build FOUR new parking garages? Just to show them how ridiculous this is," he suggested. 

Vanessa presenting her modest proposal for parking in downtown Palo Alto

Vanessa presenting her modest proposal for parking in downtown Palo Alto

And so, my Modest Proposal was born. After re-reading Jonathan Swift's brilliant 1729 pamphlet on solving Ireland's poverty problem, I spent some time crafting a similarly-structured argument for solving Palo Alto's parking problem. You can watch my performance (and its confused reception in the council chambers) in the video my friend filmed with my phone - but she stopped filming when the mayor told me my time was up. (I ignored her and kept on talking, so I could make my last and most important point.) The funniest thing (or maybe the saddest thing) was that quite a few people seemed to think I was serious - including a reporter, who asked me as we were leaving if she could contact me for more details about my 'double decker road idea'.

The entire text is below. Read, and enjoy.

A Modest Proposal

Good evening dear council members. My name is Vanessa Warheit - I’m a Palo Alto resident, mother of a child in the Palo Alto Unified School District, and the owner of a car registered here in Palo Alto. In light of tonight’s discussion on parking in our downtown, I wanted to make a modest proposal.

Clearly, the streets of Palo Alto are too congested. It takes way too long to find parking. This is bad for local businesses - which is clear from the number of local establishments that I remember from my childhood, which have long since gone out of business. Our region is growing, and we need to better support the long-term growth of our downtown. We also need to keep all these cars from spilling over into the residential neighborhoods that surround it.

But I believe the proposal to build a new parking garage downtown isn’t the answer to these problems. For one thing, it only adds 214 additional parking spaces to our downtown - not near enough for the projected growth in this area. With 17,000 more jobs and 13,000 additional residents projected in the next 20 years, we can expect even more cars on our streets. The proposed garage is also all the way over on Hamilton Street - requiring people patronizing businesses on University, or Lytton, or any of downtown’s side streets, to walk one - or more - blocks to their destination. 

What I am proposing is a project to bring free parking right in front of every single business, double our existing capacity, and maximize the use of our existing facilities. 

I have been assured by a well-known transportation official in Los Angeles that creating a double-decker road system provides the kind of free, convenient access to local businesses that we need here in Palo Alto. I would like to therefore submit for consideration a common-sense idea that is in alignment with policies T-45 (provide sufficient parking to address long-range needs) and T-47 (protect residential areas from parking impacts of nearby business districts).

I propose to make University Avenue, Hamilton Avenue, and Lytton Street double decker streets - with diagonal parking along each side at both the ground floor and the second floor - allowing easy access to establishments regardless of their vertical location within a building. Building the second story of roadways would also require eliminating the trees from our downtown, and narrowing our sidewalks - which would make walking from car to business even easier, reduce tree maintenance costs, and add an additional 50% to the number of available parking spaces.

My proposal would put our city on the map - and not only as the city with the most convenient parking in the Bay Area. Cities like Beijing and New Delhi, which have seen a significant rise in their parking, have shown 7.3% and 7.4% levels of GDP growth - compared to a paltry 3.8% here in the US. Not only has this growth increased per capita income in these cities, but the record-setting levels of air pollution generated by this growth over the past few years has also gained them significant media attention. Imagine what Palo Alto could do with that added revenue, and all that press coverage!

I can’t think of any objection that could be raised against this proposal - unless it might be that constructing such a system of freely-accessible parking might cost more than the city has in its budget. But to that I would simply suggest that increasing the speed limit to 35 mph could put this project squarely into the realm of CalTrans, and thereby qualify it for available State highway improvement funds. 

So let’s stop considering these other suggestions - ideas about analyzing different transportation demand strategies, or providing meaningful transit options, or exploring emerging technologies like self-driving cars and transportation as a service. Things like looking at expanding our bike share options, or expanding mode shift, or looking at what kinds of pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure $13m might buy the city. Let’s not have any more talk of these ideas until we have at least the faintest glimmer of hope that there might some day be a hearty and sincere attempt to put them into practice. 

For me, after so many years of offering up vain, idle, visionary ideas like these, and really despairing of any success in addressing our parking woes, I felt incredibly lucky to come upon this proposal - which I hope you will join me in embracing. It is so in line with the American way, with Palo Alto’s vision for growth, with our need for car-based mobility and complete and total independence - and, I might add, with the auto industry’s need to sell cars to each and every one of us - that I feel confident this is the best way forward for our city. 

But if someone has a better idea, I’d like to hear it. Just keep in mind, it will need to deal with 13,000 more people, and 17,000 more jobs, within the next 20 years.

Thank you.

In climate activism, public transit, streets, carbon footprint, carbon pollution, civic engagement, satire Tags satire, parking, civic engagement, Palo Alto, cities
1 Comment
Featured
IMG_7334.JPG
Feb 28, 2018
Protect the Clean Power Plan - a mother's story
Feb 28, 2018
Feb 28, 2018
Dec 17, 2017
Transport Decarbonization Alliance launched at One Planet Summit
Dec 17, 2017
Dec 17, 2017
May 2, 2017
The EPA: It Isn't Just for Clean Air Anymore
May 2, 2017
May 2, 2017
Horse v. CO2 Poop
Sep 5, 2016
Horse v. CO2 Poop
Sep 5, 2016
Sep 5, 2016
Jun 5, 2016
“My Name is Vanessa, and I Am an Optimist...”
Jun 5, 2016
Jun 5, 2016
Apr 6, 2016
Ridin' the Rails with Elliot
Apr 6, 2016
Apr 6, 2016
FB-Header-for-Tour-Hosts-Yellow-w-audience-1024x396.jpg
Mar 10, 2016
On Tour with Wild & Scenic
Mar 10, 2016
Mar 10, 2016
Feb 21, 2016
'Til the Wellheads Run Dry
Feb 21, 2016
Feb 21, 2016
Feb 15, 2016
Media Lounge Interview
Feb 15, 2016
Feb 15, 2016
Feb 15, 2016
An Open Letter to the Silicon Valley Business Times
Feb 15, 2016
Feb 15, 2016

From our Twitter feed...

  • Worse Than Poop!
    What if we addressed the cholera epidemic like we deal with #climatechange? Poop in the Time of Cholera:… https://t.co/n1itMWA68q
    Mar 30, 2018, 1:55 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @guardian: Guardian front page, Tuesday 27 March 2018: Russian diplomats in US and Europe expelled as UK allies turn the screw https://t.co/XK2S21WJxM
    Mar 26, 2018, 2:57 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @radiochick841: BREAKING!!! Melania is OUT...Hannity chosen as new First Lady. https://t.co/j78PThZBRY
    Mar 26, 2018, 2:51 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @MathewABarlow: Draft fig: histograms of storm surge in Boston Harbor: 1950-1983 (blue), 1984-2017 (orange), & 2070s (red: projec… https://t.co/ghqlycxgYB
    Mar 26, 2018, 2:50 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @UNFCCC: Whilst we are seeing chilly temperatures in Europe, #ClimateChange is leading to extreme heat in other parts of the… https://t.co/tXvMBALwAB
    Mar 1, 2018, 9:25 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @vwarheit: "My grandchildren need your help. Climate change is real, and it's the great moral question of our time. Please do… https://t.co/6HazQ2Anyr
    Feb 28, 2018, 4:38 PM
  • Worse Than Poop!
    RT @CleanAirMoms: "...It's another thing to have your only son trapped by a climate change fueled firestorm burning out of control."-… https://t.co/SUvCAoJP4K
    Feb 28, 2018, 4:37 PM
facebook twitter
  • Screenings

Worse Than Poop!

Why is carbon dioxide worse than poop? Find out with the help of an 8-year-old science expert, the Green Ninja, and a fleet of pooping cars!

Today, humans are creating more than 38 billion tons of carbon pollution every year - in fact, over 2 million pounds of it gets spewed into the air every second. This massive amount of pollution is now threatening the climate that all life depends on, and in the US, almost a third of that pollution comes from transportation. But the problem with CO2 is that you can’t see it, you can’t smell it, you can’t taste it - and that makes it hard for people to take it seriously. But what if you could see it? What if the 19 pounds of crap coming out of your car’s tailpipe was... crap?


Elliot Ingle, a bespectacled 8-year old wearing a necktie and lab coat, takes us on a short journey to imagine just such a reality. Using a combination of live action video and animation, “Worse than Poop” will illustrate basic scientific facts (why DOES a gallon of gas produce 19 pounds of CO2? How is that possible - and where does it go?). It will also work to undermine some outmoded cultural norms (what’s a better status symbol - a poo-spattered Lexus or a spiffy clean Tesla - or a fun shiny bike with a cool sidecar?). Featuring mom’s minivan (one pound of poo per mile!), the lumbering Suburban (19 pounds of poop in only 10 miles!), the Tesla S (faster than a speeding Captain Underpants!), the Nissan Leaf, the Mitsubishi i, and a flotilla of electric and people-powered bicycles and scooters, “Worse than Poop” will engage children ages 5-12 in the most important issue of our time: rejection of the fossil fuel lifestyle. 

It’s bound to make a difference. I mean, what kid doesn’t love talking about poop?

Climate change facts, what is climate change, climate change definition.

Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 9306, USA

facebook twitter